What is the test for lawfully quoading a person?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Danluck v. Birkner et al., 1946 CanLII 6 (ON CA):
Where the word “lawfully” is used in the cases, it means lawfully quoad the occupant, i.e., not tortiously: Coburn v. City of Saskatoon, 1935 CanLII 133 (SK CA), [1935] 1 W.W.R. 392 at 396, [1935] 2 D.L.R. 810.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the implications of a family law case law review of the applicable provisions and case law principles for costs in family law? (Ontario, Canada)
In a personal injury action brought by the wife against the husband for child support because of his drug addiction, does the wife rely on the law of drug addiction to argue that the husband's drug addiction would be wrong at law and contrary to public policy? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a breach of the law by an individual who has committed acts of contempt of court? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on personal injury representation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the law relating to the power of the police to search a person incidental to a lawful arrest? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the common law common law authorizes a search incident to a lawful arrest? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the issue of costs in family law cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a judge should consider some of the issues before the trial of the others? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for treating a person who is personally named as a respondent in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in respect of international law? (Ontario, Canada)
