What are the implications of a family law case law review of the applicable provisions and case law principles for costs in family law?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Stephens v Stephens, 2016 ONSC 1393 (CanLII):
In a recent decision in Davis v. Fell, [2016] O.J. No. 749, Justice O’Connell undertook a comprehensive review of the applicable provisions and case law principles for costs in a family law proceeding. I agree with and adopt that review as applicable herein.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law relating to an accident benefit application where a delay in submitting the Application due to a personal relationship preventing the Applicant from making an application? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a reviewing court review a trial judge's disposition on costs? (Ontario, Canada)
If costs cannot be agreed upon by counsel for the Respondent and the Applicant in a personal injury action, what is the date for costs? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with an application where the applicant's disrespectful behaviour was so extreme that the application was dismissed as abuse of process? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the principles of statutory compulsion and what are the implications of the principles set out in Soules and White? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the costs of a family law case involving support costs? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the legal principles applicable to an originating application? (Ontario, Canada)
On the ground of urgency, in what circumstances will the applicant continue with her application for leave to continue with the application? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the principle of corporate separateness override the equitable principles of equitable principles in the context of vicarious liability? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there to be no costs or indulgence from the court for the portion of a motion seeking to extend time for the application to extend the time of the application? (Ontario, Canada)
