What is the proper approach to determining a jury's verdict in a motor vehicle accident case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cheung v. Samra, 2018 ONSC 3480 (CanLII):
In Sacks v. Ross, the court considered the proper approach to deciding questions of causation for a jury and set out the steps the jury should undertake. An essential component of this process is for the jury to explain how the breach caused the injury.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motor vehicle accident in this province, when is the discoverability rule applicable in motor vehicle accidents? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a jury be recalled to a jury on causation in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is caused by accident? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining causation in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the time for service been determined in motor vehicle accident cases such as Chiarelli? (Ontario, Canada)
Does immoveable vehicle defeat the presumption in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where the defence called no evidence to support the presumption of negligence in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a claim against the owner or operator of the vehicle in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining material contribution and causation in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for setting aside a jury verdict in a trial where counsel's address to the jury is offensive or irrelevant to any issue properly before the jury? (Ontario, Canada)
