Is there any case law where the defence called no evidence to support the presumption of negligence in a motor vehicle accident case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Mark v. Guelph (City), 2013 ONCA 536 (CanLII):
This case is clearly distinguishable from El Dali v. Panjalingam, 2013 ONCA 24 (CanLII) where the defence called no evidence to rebut the presumption and more or less conceded that his negligence contributed to the accident.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motor vehicle accident in this province, when is the discoverability rule applicable in motor vehicle accidents? (Ontario, Canada)
Does immoveable vehicle defeat the presumption in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a non-expert expert give evidence in a motor vehicle accident case that does not contradict the findings of an expert? (Ontario, Canada)
Is inherent risk a defence in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a contributing negligence defence in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for prejudice in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have conspiracy allegations been treated in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the time for an action for damages from injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident to be commenced within two years of the date of the accident? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the devaluation principal in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts treated the issue of a proposed duty of care in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
