Does Rule 16-1(7) mean that only one party has been "substantially successful" in a case involving multiple issues?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gain v. Gain, 2011 BCSC 621 (CanLII):

The interpretation of Rule 16-1(7) was recently considered by Justice Pearlman in MacLean v. Mio, 2011 BCSC 148. At para. 30, Pearlman J. concluded that in determining which party is successful under Rule 16-1(7), the court must still consider, in a case involving multiple issues, whether one party has been “substantially successful”.

Other Questions


What are the issues costs for a party who is substantially successful on a discrete issue or issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for substantial success in cases involving multiple issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the criteria for a successful party to be successful on multiple issues throughout? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for “substantial success” in determining whether either party had a good chance of success in their claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party need to succeed on a range of issues to be considered substantially successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is the successful party entitled to an award of costs where there are multiple issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is considered substantial success when it comes to calculating the proportion of substantial success? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to award costs for substantial success based on substantial success? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a successful party to recover costs from the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.