Can Rule 129 be used to strike an originating notice?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Isley v. Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, 2004 ABQB 136 (CanLII):

Rule 129 can be used to strike an originating notice where it can be shown, without admitting evidence, that the originating notice discloses no cause of action; or where it can be established that the pleading is scandalous, frivolous, or vexatious; or otherwise is an abuse of the process of the court: Rule 129(3); Thomlinson v. Alberta (Child Services), 2003 ABQB 308 at paras. 31 and 33.

Other Questions


What is the appropriate notice period for an age title years service notice? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a Transfer Notice be invalid if the Notice is not served to the New Shareholders? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for a notice of no reasonable notice? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the appropriate length of notice for a plaintiff's notice of dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the retroactive retroactive notice period for a child with learning disabilities? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts dealt with discrimination against non-Canadian citizens on the grounds of citizenship and place of origin? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any difference between a landlord and a purchaser of a lease where the lease is registered as an actual notice rather than a bill of sale? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an employee’s duty not to compete during the notice period inconsistent with the law concerning fiduciary duties? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the definition of “Original” in the context of copyright law? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a creditor commit a tort against a debtor and the damages resulting from the tort are set off against the original debt? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.