What is the test in which a motion can be brought without prejudice?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Faklan v. Niewiadomski, 2014 ONCA 697 (CanLII):

In brief oral reasons, the motion judge correctly identified the applicable test in Reid v. Dow Corning Corp (2001), 11 CPC (5th) 809 at para. 41, rev’d (2002), 48 CPC (5th) 93. He rejected the hearsay evidence of the appellant’s solicitor as to the reasons for the delay and as to why the motion was not brought promptly. He also found that there was no evidence to establish the absence of prejudice, other than the “bald assertion” of the deponent.

Other Questions


What are the implications of a motion being brought before the House of Commons on a motion of no confidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any prejudice to a motion where the motion is not granted? (Ontario, Canada)
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of no confidence in a motion to amend the terms of a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for elevated costs of a motion for a motion to amend a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the threshold to maintain an objection to a motion of motion where the next step in the proceeding is documentary discovery? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party who brings the motion as well as the witnesses upon whom the moving/applying party relies have an obligation to present and present witnesses to the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for requiring disclosure on a motion without notice? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a letter entitled to be without prejudice privileged? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the limitation period defence in a motion brought and adjudicated under Rule 21.01(1)(a)? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.