What is the test for requiring disclosure on a motion without notice?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Adams v Adams, 2016 ONSC 3357 (CanLII):

The rationale for requiring full and frank disclosure on a motion without notice is obvious. The court and the absent adverse party are both entirely at the mercy of the moving party while none of the checks and balances of the adversary system are operative: United States v. Friedland (at para 26). The risk of the court being used as an instrument of injustice is great.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the court grant a motion to set aside an interim sealing order and publication ban obtained without notice to the media? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a motion without notice have an obligation to be fair? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a finding that the moving party on a motion made without notice fully and fairly disclose all the material facts result in the order being set aside? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for elevated costs of a motion for a motion to amend a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of no confidence in a motion to amend the terms of a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining if a motion is a genuine issue requiring a trial based only on the evidence in the Motion Record? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the reasonable notice period for an employee who is terminated without advance notice? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required in a motion for Mareva Injunction? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of striking the pleadings of a party who has failed to comply with a court order requiring disclosure disclosure? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.