Again, the trial judge carefully applied the correct legal test – the modified objective test – from Reibl v. Hughes. He considered the potential benefits and risks of the proposed procedure, a rhizotomy. He also reviewed the testimony of the respondent and his wife relating to the respondent’s medical condition, new employment in Thunder Bay as a clergyman, recent marriage, and birth of two children. These are precisely the types of factors mentioned as being worthy of consideration by the court in Reibl v. Hughes, at pp. 898-99.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.