What are the grounds of appeal against the finding that the trial judge erred by failing to consider the circumstantial evidence of impairment?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Adeyiwola, 2022 ONSC 1824 (CanLII):

In the first ground of appeal, counsel for the appellant submits that the trial judge erred by failing to consider the circumstantial evidence of impairment in the manner required by the decision in R v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000.

Other Questions


How has the trial judge considered the totality of evidence at trial for impaired driving? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for appealing on the ground of appeal against a finding that a trial judge committed a palpable and overriding error? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the grounds on which this court could find that the trial judge erred in exercising their discretion in awarding a costs award? (Ontario, Canada)
In assessing an unreasonable verdict ground of appeal, can an appellant's failure to testify be considered a grounds of appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority to interfere with a trial judge’s findings of facts? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court substitute a trial judge’s findings of fact or mixed findings of law with its own? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a finding of fact made by the trial judge? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a Deputy Judge erred in failing to find that the dispute was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the OLRB or the labour arbitrator? (Ontario, Canada)
When a judge has made an error in principle by failing to consider the relevant elements of a legal test or standard, or has erred in the application or standard? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a trial judge consider corroborating evidence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.