In what circumstances will the court exclude marihuana seized at trial?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from R.v. Blanchett, 2002 ABQB 134 (CanLII):

In R v. Hallman, supra, the court held that the marihuana seized was real evidence and did not affect trial fairness. The court, however, found that the Charter violations in this case were serious as there was a lack of impartiality on the part of the authorizing judge, lack of frank disclosure by the police officer and a hard entry into the accused’s house. Because of the seriousness of the violations, exclusion was held to be warranted.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Chief Justice of the Court of Justice Wachowich advise the jury not to read too many documents in a trial? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a jury allow evidence of marihuana plants to be admitted at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order that a city should appoint a commission to supervise the construction of a new city hall and court house? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court treated a request for additional evidence in the context of the trial? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the courts rely solely on the principle of circumstantial guarantee of trustworthiness of a nurse? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order solicitor/client costs against the unsuccessful party in a challenge to a will? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.