What are the consequences of taking unnecessary precautions to prevent accidents?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Larsen v Prince Albert and Northern Bus Lines Limited, 1952 CanLII 197 (SK CA):

Precautions to prevent accidents are not taken to protect those who are alert to the danger guarded against. They are necessary to apprise those who are unwary of the existing danger. See Smith v. C.P.R. 1920 CanLII 120 (SK CA), [1920] 3 WWR 1028, at 1032, 13 Sask LR 535, at 540 (reversed on other grounds 1921 CanLII 37 (SCC), [1921] 3 WWR 300, 62 SCR 134).

Other Questions


How have courts dealt with a claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident under the Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of using economic and actuarial evidence on an award for head of damage in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a vendor takes a personal judgment against a plaintiff, and then withdraws the execution of the contract, what is the effect of the judgment against the vendor? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for contributory negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an employer is liable for injuries sustained by a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the consequences of a dealership's failure to repair a defective vehicle? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the tax implications of an award been considered? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the impact of a motor vehicle accident on an insurance policy? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the purpose of a loss of dependency award under the Fatal Accidents Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove reasonable excuse in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.