What are the implications of a pre-certification motion?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from British Columbia v Apotex Inc., 2020 BCSC 412 (CanLII):
As pointed out by the plaintiff, similar problems have been encountered in other cases where pre-certification motions have resulted in multiple appeals and years of litigation before any certification hearing, such as in Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc., 2008 BCSC 933, reversed 2009 BCCA 104, reversed 2011 SCC 15.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for an application for a stay of execution of a motion for a motion to quash a motion of appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss a motion for summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss a motion for personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a no evidence motion and an insufficient evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision not to uphold a motion of no confidence in a City Council meeting? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to stay a motion for a stay of proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to stay a motion against the constitutionality of laws and regulation affecting the use of medical marijuana? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party intentionally refrain from appearing on a notice of motion and instead come along later, at his own convenience, and insist on having the motion reheard? (British Columbia, Canada)
In making a determinate order on a motion of no confidence in a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case, what are the reasons why such a determination is necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion for a no evidence motion in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
