An award for the cost of future care is intended to compensate the plaintiff for treatments and care that are reasonably necessary to restore the plaintiff to their pre-accident condition, so far as it is possible. That must be based on medical evidence of what is reasonably necessary to promote physical and mental health. The assessment is not a precise accounting exercise and is subject to deduction for contingencies, based on the specific care needs of the plaintiff: Pike v. Kasiri, 2016 BCSC 555 at paras. 350 and 354–356.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.