What are some cases where a judge was wrong in determining that there should be equal sharing?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hall v. Egan, 2007 BCSC 1964 (CanLII):
Pickelein v. Gillmore was a case where the trial judge was found to have erred in concluding that there should be an equal sharing without regard to considerations of the appropriateness of a monetary award to compensate for the unjust enrichment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a reference to equal shares or equal shares in a will support a per capita distribution? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge be found to be wrong in determining liability based on proof of an illegal scheme to be suitable for summary disposition? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a trial judge was wrong in finding that a plaintiff was not entitled to be held liable for sexual assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a 1972 matrimonial home agreement on the equalization of equal shares? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a claimant’s share of interest in a claim is equal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining the quantum of damages awarded by a judge in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a trial judge's findings and conclusions of fact have been shown to be wrong? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law supporting the use of historical income figures for purposes of determining the value of individual income? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a judge of "competent jurisdiction" to determine what remedy is appropriate and just in a particular case? (British Columbia, Canada)
