15. The respondent submits he and PH had discussions about the lack of progress and apparent boat damage, but provided no evidence from PH. I draw an adverse inference against the respondent for not providing any evidence from his investor PH to contradict the applicant’s account, or any explanation for why such evidence was not provided (see Singh v. Reddy, 2019 BCCA 79). On balance, I accept PH told the applicant the job looked good on April 25, 2019 and told the applicant he could expect the progress payment as requested. I find the job was reasonably done as of that date.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.