What is the test for unjust enrichment in matrimonial cases?

British Columbia, Canada

The following excerpt is from Perala v. Bowditch, 2006 BCSC 512 (CanLII):

In Pettkus v. Becker, 1980 CanLII 22 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, 117 D.L.R. (3d) 257, Mr. Justice Dickson (as he then was) wrote, at 848, that, to make out unjust enrichment in matrimonial cases, three requirements must be satisfied: “an enrichment, a corresponding deprivation and absence of any juristic reason for the enrichment.”

Other Questions

Does the principle of unjust enrichment apply to family law cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes unjust enrichment in the context of human rights cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have Canadian courts used common law concepts of unjust enrichment and constructive trust in family law cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for an unjust enrichment claim in a matrimonial relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court distinguish between family and commercial unjust enrichment cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some examples of unjust enrichment where a court found unjust enrichment when a plaintiff removed her elderly mother from Canada to live with her in Guatemala? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test of unjust enrichment in the context of a claim for unjust enrichment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for considering unjust enrichment in the context of a claim for equitable enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the remedy of unjust enrichment be used to displace the statutory doctrine of unlawful enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party who is seeking damages for unjust enrichment have to prove that its conduct was untainted? (Ontario, Canada)