What is the test for unjust enrichment in a personal injury case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Klaassen v. Juhan, 2009 BCSC 1578 (CanLII):

The plaintiff’s case is that the defendants have been unjustly enriched. The doctrine was explained in Pegler v. Avio, 2008 BCSC 128 at paras. 49-53, 49 R.F.L. (6th) 145: Unjust Enrichment

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the BCSC provide advice to the parties on organization and preparation of the personal injury trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a claim for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In making a determinate order on a motion of no confidence in a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case, what are the reasons why such a determination is necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Canada consider a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.