On what basis is the evidence that was given to the officer at the time of the incident admissible?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Gonzalez v. City of Bakersfield, Case No.: 1:16-cv-0107 - JLT (E.D. Cal. 2018):
On the other hand, what is known to the officer at the time bears on the facts and circumstances of the event. Ruvalcaba v. City of Los Angeles, 64 F.3d 1323, 1328 (9th Cir. 1995).
Page 3
Thus, any evidence known to the officers is admissible but information not known to them is not.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any evidence that all evidence about a recent job and related earnings was given in testimony? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the erroneous admission of evidence in a civil case provide a basis for federal habeas relief? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a hearing officer, parole officer, hearing officer and parole official be immunized from prosecution? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a visa officer's manager entitled to disagree with an officer's recommendation if the visa officer has not conducted an oral interview? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any evidence that a Public Prosecutions Officer (PRRA) ignored, misinterpreted or ignored or ignored the evidence? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for an officer to determine whether or not they err by giving more weight to a statement by the Canadian migratory integrity officer in Port-au-Prince than the other documents submitted in evidence? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence in the context of evidence that is not logically tending to prove a point? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How is the admission of evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In assessing the evidence with respect to irreparable harm, does the court have to rely only on admissible evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
