How have courts interpreted discovery examination rules in the past?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Howatt v. Chandler, 2016 NSSC 216 (CanLII):
While in the context of discovery examination, I did locate one decision under the old Rules – Tidgwell v. Browning-Ferris Industries Ltd. (2000) 186 N.S.R. (2d) 139 (NSSC), per Goodfellow J.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of taxation statutes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted section 8 and 9 of the Rules of Civil Procedure in medical malpractice cases? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the terms of the minutes of a settlement agreement where a husband and wife's insurance policies were to be revoked? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the admissions made in the settlement agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has Rule 77 been interpreted in matrimonial matters? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the law on title to after-acquired goods in the absence of fraud? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a discovery transcript admissible under the rules of evidence? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a shareholder's agreement in a transfer of shares? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the argument that solicitor-client privilege is not absolute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting section 3 of the National Statutory Interpretation Guidelines? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
