It is well recognized that non est factum involves a form of compromise between two competing objectives. On the one hand, there is the objective of providing relief for “a signer whose consent is genuinely lacking”, and on the other hand there is the objective of protecting “innocent third parties who have acted upon an apparently regular and properly executed document”: Marvco at 787, citing Saunders v. Anglia Building Society, [1971] A.C. 1004 at 1023–24.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.