When will the BCSC admit the Factum?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from A.S. v British Columbia (Director Of Child, Family and Community Services), 2017 BCSC 1175 (CanLII):

The application to admit the Factum related to Petition #4 only. Its purpose, as I understood it, was to provide evidence of post-trial conduct of counsel that may reveal matters such as whether the lawyers were on a frolic of their own. While I accept that in some cases, post-trial conduct can be considered if it informs an assessment of a lawyer’s conduct in the litigation (see Walker v. John Doe, 2014 BCSC 294 at paras. 41-44 and Jodoin at paras. 33-34), I concluded that nothing in the Factum would be probative to the issues that are relevant here.

Other Questions


What is the test for admitting and admitting certificates in a voir dire? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for admitting fresh evidence in an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
When is evidence of good character not admitted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting or denying evidence that has been obtained in violation of the Charter of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the doctrine of non est factum be applied in real estate contracts where the contract is not binding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting a confession in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for admitting new evidence in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Law Society of Upper Canada require an applicant with a lengthy criminal record to be admitted to the law society? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting new evidence in a criminal case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting evidence of discreditable conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.