Is there a presumption that the original protection order is correct and that the onus is on the party attempting to change the status quo?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Children’s Aid Society of Hamilton v. A. H. et al, 2014 ONSC 3022 (CanLII):

[17] At para. 26 of C.A.S. of Toronto v. H.G. Curtis, J. observed that on a motion of this nature, there is a presumption that the original protection order is correct and that the onus to change a status quo is on the party attempting to change it. At paragraph 28 Curtis, J. stated that, for the moving party to be successful on a temporary hearing of this nature, the best interests of the child must require a change in the care of the child.

Other Questions


When determining a status review application, including the original finding of protection, is the original order being reviewed? (Ontario, Canada)
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
In a status review hearing, what is the test for assuming that the original order is correct? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a material change in circumstances under what circumstances would have changed the terms of an order under which an order was made? (Ontario, Canada)
If a party has delayed obtaining a spousal and/or child support order while trying to negotiate a settlement with the other party, is the recipient of that support order entitled to the recipient? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the continued conflict between the parties a material change in circumstances for a change in a restraining order? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the term "support order" need to be changed to include "support orders" in the definition of a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a variation of an interim order be made in the context of a motion to change a final order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for changing a final protection order on a temporary basis? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the obligation of a party moving for an order that will affect the rights of the absent party to make full and fair disclosure of all material facts? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.