Is a mortgagor with substantial equity entitled to pre-leave costs?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Huot, 2008 SKQB 345 (CanLII):

The bank further suggests that I ought to rule that, in any case of a mortgagor having substantial equity, pre-leave costs should be ordered as a matter of course. The bank suggests this on the basis that a mortgagor with substantial equity simply is not in the category of the financially distressed mortgagor that was contemplated in Saskatoon Credit Union v. MacKay.

Other Questions


Is a plaintiff entitled to security for costs under Rule 9 of the Rules as to costs in a personal injury action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a mortgagee entitled to claim costs for arrears of 6 years of interest which have never been paid? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a mortgage holder entitled to a third party's costs? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a sheriff entitled to costs as against the execution creditor from the time of the order to withdraw? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a mortgagorā€™s equity of redemption constitute an insurable interest in the mortgaged property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a mortgagee entitled to the costs of a redemption action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a mortgagee entitled to the rental of a tenant that is also a mortgagor's tenant? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a mortgagee entitled to possession of the mortgagor's chattels? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a receiver entitled to be indemnified out of the estate for the costs of an adverse application against him? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a tenant entitled to lawyer fees and client costs if the assignee of a tenant defends the tenant in an action brought by the landlord? (Saskatchewan, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.