Is a mortgage holder entitled to a third party's costs?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Frederiksen v Western Can Inv Co, 1926 CanLII 199 (SK QB):
Moreover the evidence shows that the plaintiff has not paid anything on account of the mortgage for a long time and that she has been dilatory in prosecuting her action; hence I can see no reason to deprive the defendant of its costs, but on the contrary cogent reasons why the plaintiff should pay such costs (Bolton v. Postnikoff, 1926 CanLII 170 (SK CA), [1926] 4 D.L.R. 22).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a party and a party have to pay additional costs to a mortgage? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to security for costs under Rule 9 of the Rules as to costs in a personal injury action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a third party party be liable if a lamp goes out? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a dentist entitled to be indemnified or indemnified in a third party action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a mortgagee sue the mortgagor on the basis that the mortgaged property is not in a condition in which it was when the mortgage was signed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a registered ownership of a mortgage? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a common law procedure act, 1854, ch. 125, which enacted that a plaintiff is not entitled to any costs in an action commenced after the action was commenced? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a mortgagee who has sold the mortgaged property be reinstated in his right to sue for the mortgage debt? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the legal consequences if a party agrees to surrender a lease with another party? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on third party procedure in King’s Bench? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
