In what circumstances will the Court consider enrichment and deprivation as equalization?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gomel v Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 2021 BCSC 699 (CanLII):
In Moore v. Sweet, 2018 SCC 52 at para. 41, Justice Côté, writing for the majority, discussed the necessity that enrichment and deprivation be "two sides of the same coin":
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a BC Supreme Court case, in what circumstances will the court consider success versus loss of custody? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a civil court require a higher degree of probability than it would require for a criminal court to consider whether negligence was established? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court consider any new or additional material that counsel have submitted to the Court? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in New South Wales consider whether an Australian court made a mistake in applying the relevant law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court order that an order be made by the Court of Appeal be made in special circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the circumstances of the parties into their 70’s and 80s be considered equalized in the context of equalization of income between the parties in their 70s and 90s? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court consider 4 costs considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the court order that common sense be considered as a factor in determining future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court consider relevancy of the relevant questions in a case? (British Columbia, Canada)
