What constitutes misconduct on the part of litigants?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Briante v. Vancouver Island Health Authority, 2015 BCSC 807 (CanLII):

Misconduct on the part of litigants is a factor which may justify departure from the usual rule as to costs. Misconduct in this sense does not refer to merely suboptimal conduct, conduct short of perfection, or questionable judgment, but rather means conduct which “manifestly warrants rebuke”: LeClair v. Mibrella Inc., 2011 BCSC 533 at para. 11.

Other Questions


Does abusive language directed at a non-litigant constitute professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the loss of a trial date, prolonging litigation, and associated difficulties and hardships that may be suffered by one or more of the parties suffer not factors that constitute “prejudice” in considering whether to grant the amendments? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes misconduct of counsel at a credible basis hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current professional misconduct test for professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will special costs be awarded for misconduct in the course of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes the interests of justice in the context of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is litigation privilege and what is the argument that litigation privilege means? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a finding of no misconduct in a professional conduct review panel finding no misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
Are there two exceptions to the doctrine of special costs for misconduct in the course of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a breach of the No Cash Rule constitute professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.