Can a breach of the No Cash Rule constitute professional misconduct?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lyons (Re), 2008 LSBC 9 (CanLII):

The fact that there are no precedents for a finding that a breach of the “No Cash Rule” constitutes professional misconduct does not restrict this Panel. Such a finding can be made in a wide variety of circumstances. Whether conduct deserves discipline is a factual question to be decided by the member’s professional peers. “What may, in each particular circumstance, constitute professional misconduct ought not to be unduly restricted.” Stevens v. Law Society (Upper Canada) (1979), 55.O.R. (2d) 405 (Div. Ct.) at 410.

Other Questions


What is the difference between a breach of the Professional Conduct Rules and professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a breach of trust accounting rules sufficient to constitute professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current professional misconduct test for professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for professional misconduct under the BC Professional Conduct Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances has the Law Society of BC suspended for a month and ordered costs for professional misconduct associated with accounting rule breaches? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a finding of no misconduct in a professional conduct review panel finding no misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does abusive language directed at a non-litigant constitute professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes a "Rules breach" in the Professional Conduct Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a failure to pay a practice debt constitute professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for professional misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.