When full restoration to the plaintiff’s pre-accident condition cannot be achieved, the court should strive to provide the compensation necessary to achieve the provision of adequate future care: Milina at para. 172. The purpose of an award for future care is to compensate a plaintiff for costs which reasonably may be expected to be incurred to preserve and promote the plaintiff’s mental and physical health: Milina at para. 78; Gigmac v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2012 BCCA 351 at para. 30.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.