In these circumstances, it was appropriate to conclude that the respondent’s consent to the order had been vitiated, necessitating a review as to whether or not the consent order was in the best interests of the child. This, in effect, is what the chambers judge did when she considered Miglin v. Miglin, supra by way of analogy only.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.