33 That view was adopted by Sigurdson J. of this court in Heading v. Delta (1994), 22 M.P.L.R. (2d) 256. In that case, the minutes of the hearing of a board of variance recorded its decision but not its reasons for allowing an application to vary. Commencing at page 266, Mr. Justice Sigurdson analyzed the reasons for judgment given in Metchosin and concluded that Mr. Justice Lambert's analysis of subs. 962(2) is correct, and that it is not inconsistent with that of the majority. With respect, I agree.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.