What are the implications of the BCSC's decision not to vary the costs award in the Reasons?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from D.N. v M.R, 2019 BCSC 1354 (CanLII):
I have read the cases cited by both parties in their submissions and I agree with the respondent that the parties should be given an opportunity to provide an argument in respect to whether the costs award in the Reasons should be varied. In particular, to consider the four step inquiry set out in Fotheringham v. Fotheringham, 2001 BCSC 1321.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision not to award costs from interlocutory proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a decision not to award double costs in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of an arbitrator's decision in a case where a plaintiff was awarded an award for discrimination against her employer based on her disability? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Court in England and Wales treated the Court of Appeal's decision to award the Commissioner's Award for Disgraceable Dismissal/Disparability? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offeror be awarded costs or double costs from the date of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s. 215.5(7) of the BCSC prohibit the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles from extending the decision date of a decision until after the date of the decision has been determined? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge award a special costs award for an unsuccessful claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff has not used an item of service in the past, is it appropriate to include that cost in the future cost award? (British Columbia, Canada)
