That points out a significant difference between the McNeil v. Martin case and this one. In the former, the spouse who was intended to be protected by dower legislation would have a real say in what that value would be because without her consent any purchaser in the sale would buy subject to her life interest. In this case, however, as stated above the creditor who purchases the dower interest has the upper hand because the property cannot be disposed of without the creditor’s consent who will presumably attempt to hold out for maximum value. That is not protecting one spouse’s dower interest; it is punishing the other spouse.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.