What is the case law and what is the relevant case law in relation to document production?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Eastman v. Eastman, 2013 BCSC 1019 (CanLII):
Mayer v. Mayer, among other things, was about relevant documents at the two paragraphs cited by the defendants and discussed general principles related to document production. Accordingly, it is of no assistance to the case at bar.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law in relation to the production of relevant documents? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order that a party provide an affidavit verifying its list of documents when in the absence of any adequate explanation, relevant documents have been omitted from the list? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of the court's discretion to order production of documents under Rule 7-1(17)? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for counsel to describe documents in a way that would allow the other side to view the documents in the same way? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court consider relevancy of the relevant questions in a case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant case law in relation to property division issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where adjectives relating to acts of the other side are not relevant? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Master order production of documents under Rule 26(11)? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of an application under Rule 26(11) for production of documents in the hands of third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a manufacturer of a product is responsible for a product's adverse effects? (British Columbia, Canada)
