Can a financial institution document be used to rebut the presumption of resulting trust in a personal injury case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kolic v Kolic, 2019 BCSC 1463 (CanLII):

In Madsen Estate v. Saylor, 2007 SCC 18, Rothstein J. for the majority held that financial institution documents along with testimony in relation to them did not constitute sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of resulting trust in that case:

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In making a determinate order on a motion of no confidence in a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case, what are the reasons why such a determination is necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a claim for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Canada consider a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the presumption of resulting trust in a purchase money resulting trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who receives funds from a parent to their adult child to rebut the presumption of a resulting trust rebutting that the transfer is a gift? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.