He then adopts Cory J.’s comments in MacKay v. Manitoba, 1989 CanLII 26 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 357 and concludes that where the applicant: ... seeks to attack the impugned rules on the basis of their alleged effect. It would be difficult if not impossible for a motions judge to assess the merits of the application without evidence of those effects, by way of adjudicative facts (i.e. actual instances of the use or threatened use of the impugned rules) and legislative facts (i.e. the purpose, history and perceptions of the impugned rules)...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.