What is the test for frivolous, vexatious or abuse of process?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Marciano v. Landa, 2005 SKQB 58 (CanLII):

For a case to be considered frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process, the alleged cause of action must be such that no reasonable person could treat it as bona fide and contend that he was entitled to approach the court with such a complaint: MacDonald v. Pier, 1922 CanLII 29 (SCC), [1923] S.C.R. 107.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether an action is frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a statement of claim frivolous, vexatious or abuse of process? (Ontario, Canada)
What constitutes a vexatious proceeding or an abuse of the court’s process? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the court use its power to control the abuse of the court’s process by litigants pursuing vexatious applications? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes an abuse of the court’s process in a vexatious proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is vexatious action and what is an abuse of process? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the issue of abuse of process apply to abuse of power? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a complaint be deemed frivolous, frivolous, and vexatious? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the consequences of a frivolous and vexatious pleadings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application under Rule 9-5(d) be dismissed as an abuse of process? (British Columbia, Canada)