[10] The Court of Appeal in MacDonald v. Magel (2003), 67 O.R. (3d) 181, 176 O.A.C. 201, 231 D.L.R. (4th) 479, 43 R.F.L. (5th) 149, 2003 CanLII 18880, [2003] O.J. No. 3707, 2003 CarswellOnt 3606, acknowledged that, despite rule 24, the trial judge retains discretion to fix costs in an amount that he or she feels appropriate in all of the circumstances. It is also clear that the court may consider the financial circumstances of the party against whom a costs order is made. I have no financial statement from either party.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.