What is the importance of complying with court orders?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Mckinley (Re), 2019 LSBC 20 (CanLII):
In Law Society of BC v. Scholz, 2009 LSBC 33, the review board quoted with approval the following statement made by the hearing panel on the importance of complying with court orders (cited at para. 59):
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court order that an order be made by the Court of Appeal be made in special circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a Defendant be found in contempt of court for failing to comply with a court order to pay child support? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the husband be ordered to pay costs to the wife for his failure to comply with the rules of court and order the wife to pay solicitor and client costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff set aside an order dismissing her claim for failure to attend a case management hearing and comply with case management orders? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order a charging order against costs of a contempt application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles used by the Court of Appeal in making an order to refer the issue to the Superior Court of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a finding of contempt based on a failure to obey a court order result in the application being subsumed into the contempt order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court be functus officio where it entered an order with respect to liability and damages but retains jurisdiction to order costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
