What is the legal test for submitting a joint penalty at a discipline hearing?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Law Society of Ontario v. Miller, 2019 ONLSTH 106 (CanLII):

The cases in which a joint penalty is submitted are different from cases in which the penalty is not jointly submitted. Joint penalty cases are the result of penalty negotiation. As a result, the penalty is often somewhat less than it would have been in a contested hearing. So long as the penalty is reasonable and not so low or high as to shock the conscience of the public or bring the discipline system into disrepute, the panel presented with a joint penalty is obliged to accept it: Law Society of Upper Canada v. Cooper, 2009 ONLSAP 7. The reasons at paras. 24 and 25 of Deslauriers make it clear that the primary focus in joint penalty cases is examination of the range of penalties assessed in other cases, to see whether or not the joint penalty submitted is reasonable.

Other Questions


What considerations must be considered in determining the disposition of a hearing officer’s finding that the penalty imposed by the hearing officer was excessive? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for a joint penalty submission? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for a licensee who has no discipline history and has completed a response to the Law Society before a summary hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a joint submission on penalty be made jointly? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the four guiding principles for penalty at a discipline hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test used to determine whether an application has a reasonable prospect of success following a summary hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for failing to respond at a disciplinary hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the role of a hearing panel in deciding a joint application? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of a joint submission on penalty and costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a joint submission need to be substituted with another penalty that is within the range of reasonableness? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.