What is the test for a defendant to be successful at a second and final examination?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from McKay v. Passmore, 2005 BCSC 570 (CanLII):
The defendants must satisfy the court that there is some question or matter that could not have been dealt with at the first examination: Jackson v. Miller, [1999] B.C.J. No. 2751 (S.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the principles applied on an application to examine a second representative of a corporate defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant continue to examine for discovery after an examination for discovery has been adjourned? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can counsel for the party being examined on examination for discovery interfere on cross-examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has demonstrated adequate reason for a second medical examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to compel a defendant to undergo a psychiatric examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for ordering a second medical examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the court have to consider prior no fault examinations before making a decision on a no fault examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a plaintiff was successful in obtaining judgment for monies that had been loaned to a defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a successful party to recover costs from the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for “substantial success” in determining whether either party had a good chance of success in their claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
