The following excerpt is from Trohimovich v. U.S., 991 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1993):
Stanley J. Trohimovich appeals pro se the district court's orders (1) dismissing his action pursuant to a permanent injunction entered in a previous action; and (2) denying his motion to vacate judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291. We review de novo, see Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.