Is there any reasonable probability that counsel's error or error of judgment affected the verdict?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Fierro, E055731 (Cal. App. 2013):

Finally, there is no reasonable probability that counsel's decision affected the verdict. Fernandes never wavered from his testimony that he saw defendant pull an object out of his waistband, run to the toilet, and throw it in. A metal object was immediately found in the toilet. Given the strong evidence of defendant's guilt, counsel's alleged errors were not "so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial." (Strickland v. Washington, supra, 466 U.S. at p. 687.) Defendant has failed to show that counsel was ineffective or he suffered any prejudice as a result of counsel's performance.

Page 14

We reject defendant's claims regarding election, instructional error, and ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment.

Other Questions


What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable probability that there was no reasonable probability of error affecting a result? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between clerical error in recording a verdict and deliberative error in reaching a verdict? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "probable and reasonable" or "reasonably foreseeable" in addressing the natural and probable consequences of climate change? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be denied relief under the federal reasonably probable standard or state reasonably probable? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for finding that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as a "counsel" under the Sixth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a "reasonable probability" that counsel's failings would have affected the outcome of a trial? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable probability that the court's alleged error in failing to obtain and consider a supplemental probation report adversely affected defendant's sentence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.