Is there any need to instruct the jury as to multiple conspiracies?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Barrera, 486 F.2d 333 (2nd Cir. 1973):
There was no need to instruct the jury as to multiple conspiracies. Only one conspiracy was alleged and proved. Barrera's request was properly denied. See United States v. Calabro, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a jury properly instructed on the issue of multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the jury need to instruct the jury on multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the proper multiple conspiracies instruction in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between a single conspiracy and a multiple conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a judge's failure to define specific intent within the body of the conspiracy charge in the instructions render the instructions inadequate? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the first instruction and second instruction in a motion to deny an instruction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there a single conspiracy as charged in the indictment or multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the US Supreme Court interpreted the instruction that a finding of conspiracy against a defendant does not mandate acquittal of a defendant where there is evidence of other conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the jury need to be instructed that there are multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have instructions been interpreted in the context of multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
