Is there any evidence that the court erred when it declined to instruct on withdrawal as a defense to aiding and abetting?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Appling, A123592, A123594, Super. Ct. No. VCR187707, Super. Ct. No. VCR187708 (Cal. App. 2010):

Matthews contends the court erred when it declined his request to also instruct on second degree murder and manslaughter, or on withdrawal as a defense to aiding and abetting.22 We disagree, because there was no substantial evidence to support such instructions in this case. (See People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 162 ["the existence of 'any evidence, no matter how weak' will not justify instructions on a lesser included offense, but such instructions are required whenever evidence that the defendant is guilty only of the lesser offense is 'substantial enough to merit consideration' by the jury"]; see also People v. Taylor, supra, 48 Cal.4th at p. 623 [in the absence of evidence of second degree murder, court was not required to decide legal question of whether second degree murder is a lesser included offense when the prosecution proceeds only on a theory of felony murder].)

Page 27

Other Questions


Does the trial court erred by instructing the jury on self-defense and by declining to give the jury instructions on the lesser related charge of being an accessory after the fact? (California, United States of America)
When a jury is given instructions on aiding and abetting and withdrawal of one who aids and abets a crime, what are the implications of this error? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the specific intent instructions under the standard aiding and abetting instructions? (California, United States of America)
If there was substantial evidence of imperfect self-defense not inconsistent with the defense theory of the case, does the trial court have a sua sponte duty to instruct a defendant not to testify? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct on the elements of rape and sodomy generally? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have to instruct the jury on the law of aiding and abetting liability of a defendant in a kidnapping case? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's contention that the trial court erred in denying defense counsel's request for an instruction identifying mitigating factors? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to instruct on the defense of others as a legal defense to assault? (California, United States of America)
Is a federal or state law error for failing to instruct on a requested affirmative defense instruction supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.