How have courts treated a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct on the elements of rape and sodomy generally?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Griffin, 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 743, 33 Cal.4th 536, 93 P.3d 344 (Cal. 2004):

To the extent defendant claims that the trial court erred by refusing his request to instruct on the elements of murder, rape, and sodomy generally, and not solely on the penetration element of rape and sodomy, we dismiss his claim "as not properly raised: it is perfunctorily asserted without argument in support." (People v. Ashmus, supra, 54 Cal.3d at p. 985, fn. 15, 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 112, 820 P.2d 214.)

26. To the extent defendant claims the jury could exercise mercy apart from the evidence, and should have been instructed accordingly, the contention lacks merit. A jury may not exercise mercy in this fashion, and therefore should not be instructed that it could. (People v. Benson, supra, 52 Cal.3d at pp. 808-809, 276 Cal.Rptr. 827, 802 P.2d 330.)

Other Questions


Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on first degree murder because the information alleged only that the murder of Agent Cross was committed with malice aforethought? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to the lesser included offense of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to give the cautionary instruction at the end of trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a claim that the trial court erred by failing to provide a written copy of the jury instructions? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.