Is there any difference between a statement expressing intent to kill and an actual crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Worley, B284948 (Cal. App. 2018):

3. The prosecution said attempted murder "would be" that crime, but attempted murder requires a "direct but ineffectual act toward accomplishing the intended killing," not simply a statement expressing intent to kill. (People v. Lee (2003) 31 Cal.4th 613, 623 (emphasis added).)

Other Questions


When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the mental state required for a conviction of a specific intent crime and that of those convicted of a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a general intent crime and a specific intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Is sexual penetration a specific intent crime rather than a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime, does other-crimes evidence admissible? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct guilty of not only the intended crime but also of any other crime the perpetrator actually commits as a result of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who committed a crime under a different sentencing scheme that existed at the time he committed the crime be sentenced to a different sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of referring to count 3 as a specific intent crime rather than a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there were two crimes committed at the same time, one committed with the same intent and objectives, and the other committed with different intentions and objectives? (California, United States of America)
Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.