Is there any case law where a defendant's right to counsel was called into evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hubble, 2d Crim. No. B294245 (Cal. App. 2020):

Hubble contends his "invocation of his right to counsel should never have been placed into evidence." He is correct. Evidence regarding a defendant's decision to request counsel is not admissible. (People v. Armstrong, supra, 6 Cal.5th at pp. 789-790.)

Other Questions


What is the difference between a defendant's absolute right to counsel and his unqualified constitutional right to discharge counsel if he pleases and represents himself? (California, United States of America)
What are defendant's rights regarding counsel, counsel and Boykin/Tahl rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a waiver of counsel when a defendant seeks to forgo the right to counsel and engage in self-representation? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's argument violated his right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel include a right to loyal assistance? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting evidence pursuant to California Evidence Code section 1237 impermissibly deny defendants their constitutional rights to confrontation and cross-examination? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.