Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Vaughn, B277941 (Cal. App. 2018):
A defendant's right to due process is violated when a court admits evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant if (1) "'"the identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unnecessary"'" and, if so, (2) "'"the identification itself was [not otherwise] reliable under the totality of the circumstances."' [Citation.]" (People v. Clark (2016) 63 Cal.4th 522, 556.)
Page 20
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting identification evidence violate a defendant's right to due process law? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting into evidence of volunteered statements by a defendant prior to his having been advised of his rights under the Federal Constitution violate such rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a pretrial identification procedure that violates a defendant's due process rights? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's reliance on evidence code section 730 of the Evidence Code Section 730 a violation of his constitutional right to access a mental health expert? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the application of "ordinary rules of evidence" such as section 352 of California Evidence Code section 352 violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that admitting the evidence in a civil case would have violated his federal confrontation rights? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting evidence pursuant to California Evidence Code section 1237 impermissibly deny defendants their constitutional rights to confrontation and cross-examination? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
