The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Lugpong, 933 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1991):
The district court erred, however, when it attempted to explain to the jury that a defendant need only have played a minor or "slight" role in the conspiracy, instructing the jury that it could find a connection based on slight evidence. This instruction was incorrect. See United States v. Esparza, 876 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1989).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.